Aristotle maintained that humans by nature are political beings. So, regardless of whether or not a writer has applied conscious effort to incorporate themes of a political or social nature into their work, such ideas will creep in. This is true in the case of both Cheever and Dickenson. Cheever makes reference to The American Dream, and Cold War paranoia regarding Communism in his stories. Similarly, Dickenson’s poetry can be deconstructed to find allusions of The American Civil War. We cannot escape contemporary political or social influences in our ever day lives so why should our writing be any different?
In an interview, Mo Yan stated that "Because
a writer lives within society, the life that he describes includes politics and
a wide variety of social problems, so a writer who cares about society, a
writer who cares about the suffering of people, should naturally be critical.” A novel that successfully incorporates a wonderful quality of writing and a political/social
statement to me, is ideal. Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four is a great example of this as it tackles the idea of a totalitarian socialist future-which
was gaining influence in Europe at the
time of the book’s publication.
Good post, really nice references that actually made me think!
ReplyDeleteYou make a very good point that politics will infiltrate all work because we naturally take a political stance on everything. I agree, why should writing be any different? :)
ReplyDelete